Search for: "State v. Save" Results 1301 - 1320 of 11,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
“When an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on appeal… An objection to evidence on the grounds of prejudice or relevance cannot be raised for the first time on appeal” Akers v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984) (requiring that a facially content-neutral ban on camping must be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech"); United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:13 am by Daniel M. Gerstein, Douglas Ligor
General Assembly passed the “Uniting for peace” Resolution 377 (V)A. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
The court noted the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence J. Spiwak
Circuit’s 1973 ruling in National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If the mandate reduced mortality by only one percent, that means that avoiding just a two-week delay saved the lives of over 300 Americans. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:11 am by Thomas Burke
”  TransUnion stated further: We have been in compliance with our obligations and we remain in compliance with the consent order today. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 5:55 am by Joel A. Webber
Despite what one might expect, Thomson Reuters’ “State of the UK Legal Market 2022“, issued this month, demonstrates that in-house counsel are laggards in using the systems and software that can save lawyers’ time and catch their mistakes. [read post]