Search for: "State v. So" Results 1301 - 1320 of 117,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm by Marcel Pemsel
This question is going to be answered in EUIPO v Nowhere (case C-337/22 P) for opposition proceedings and in Shopify v EUIPO (case C-751/22 P) in invalidity proceedings. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Their comments are premised on the presumption that AHIs are caused by a malign state based capability being deliberately applied against American human targets in various overseas and domestic locations. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:17 pm by Arkady Itkin
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeal held that section 42 USC 1981 prohibits employer from discriminating against United States citizens, because an employer that does so gives one class of people – noncitizens, or perhaps some group of noncitizens – a greater right to make contract than “white citizens”. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm by David Super
  The Court’s opinion in Vermont Yankee v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:50 am by Will Baude
Sunstein, Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 Harv. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:06 am by Eric Fruits
If so, then that policy or practice “will not be deemed justified by genuine issues of technical or economic feasibility. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:56 am by David Klein
On June 17, 2024, a judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted final approval of the class settlement reached by the parties in Lateano v. [read post]