Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
Roberts, Jr., Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
Justice Stevens’s first majority opinion involving Guantanamo was Rasul v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
As usual, Justice Thomas did not speak. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:18 am
Assuming that Stevens and Thomas might take opposite sides, it appeared that either Kennedy or Breyer, or perhaps both, would hold the balance. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
The next body of cases involves less traditional alignments among the Justices – generally, the Court’s left (Stevens, Ginsburg, and Souter) and right (Scalia and Thomas) wings joining together to form a five-Justice majority. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:38 am
My letter to the justice who authored the Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Quon, NASA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
I'll grant that Stevens First Amendment views seem to have become more liberal, but on the issue of reproductive rights, which is where Taylor seems to hang his hat, it seems to me that Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter were actually acting as one would expect a conservative jurist to act, by respecting stare decisis. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
There remain three consistent votes in favor of state sovereign immunity: Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am
” Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
Justice Stevens also joined the majority when the Supreme Court further developed those limitations in State Farm v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
The contrast with the US Supreme Court is startling – on the day that Justice Stevens retirement was announced there are already hundreds of articles about the possible replacements. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, an opin-ion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
In Renico v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
JOHNSON v. [read post]
