Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 20,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 12:29 pm
“Indeed, blind obedience to stare decisis would leave this Court still abiding grotesque errors like Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:29 am
Even before the Supreme Court decided McLane Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:37 am
With Justice Scalia again writing on behalf of the majority in in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The court might then amend the terms of the trust so that the money could still go to the university to support minority women in science. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Generic and branded pharmaceutical manufacturers squared off again this week in Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
As the Court noted in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 3:00 pm
From the AP: The Supreme Court avoided a catastrophic accident last year when a piece of marble at least 2 feet long crashed to the ground in an interior courtyard used by the justices and their aides, according to several court employees.The incident, which the court still fails to acknowledge publicly, took place in the tense spring of 2022, as the court already was dealing with death threats and other security concerns and… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
On Nov. 30, the Supreme Court picked up the phone to tackle that very question in oral argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Still,... [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm
John Fund in the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:50 am
Indeed, Justice Breyer even glowingly referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Gottschalk v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
The Court might be able to craft a decision based upon a newly hatched federalism principle that’s somehow cabined to the context of Section 3 disqualifications for federal office (or, narrower still, only for the presidency). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
And with Halo and Stryker still pending, what we can see from the Justices to date is the twin decisions in Highmark and Octane, which bestow broad discretion on the district court and limit appellate review to abuse of that discretion. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
In Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk, Supreme Court ducks actual mootness issue raised by Rule 68 offers
26 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm
Other justices voiced broader concerns with the case, while still others suggested that Jones should challenge his sentence through an entirely different path. [read post]
