Search for: "Street v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 10,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2009, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:58 pm
At issue in Rowe is whether the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA, not to be confused with the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act), which features prominently in Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:23 pm
This seems a perfect example.One benefit of state courts is that they're not limited by the "case and controversy" requirement of Article III, alongside the overly strict interpretation of that provision articulated by federal courts. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:31 am
Plaintiff in Miley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm
Stadt v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
See Whitlock v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm
Great news for employees and volunteers of rescues and shelters — thanks to the recent case of Van Dusen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 1:04 pm
State, 2008 Ind. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am
The Court also heard argument in Williamson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:03 am
Additional Resources: Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:03 am
Additional Resources: Davis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
(People v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Here, the problem was construction of two homes, each of which required off-street parking. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Williams) reported that the Caperton v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:23 pm
Why here and not in the 2008 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
