Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 14,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
In Awad v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 9:54 am
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court issued an opinion today in Matrixx Initiatives v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
by guest blogger Marketa Trimble With the July 14, 2016, decision in Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:35 pm
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am
The first thing that happened was that the court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson, who has a strong antitrust background but (a) is based in San Francisco and (b) handled discovery-related matters for Judge YGR in Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
” Tellabs Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:50 pm
VIKRAM DAVID AMAR AND MICHAEL SCHAPS With many eyes this week on the Ninth Circuit litigation challenging President Trump’s Executive Order regulating entry into the U.S. by nationals of seven Middle Eastern and African countries, less noticed but potentially as important is a separate lawsuit (San Francisco v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm
On January 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
Thompson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm
The California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
