Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 4,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Lock up is 23 hours per day. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
If driven by moral intuitions, why isn’t it just similar behavior cropping up in similar circumstances. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:28 pm
By standing up to consumer fraud and consumer rip-offs, and in the right case filing consumer protection lawsuits and class-actions you too can help ensure that other consumers’ rights are protected from consumer rip-offs and unscrupulous or dishonest practices. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
I can’t afford to tell my Clients to only use the HER web site when many of the best homes for sale are not even showing up. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:02 am
Trial Lawyers College v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
” We should stop referring to consumers. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
This focus on federal civil law crops up throughout PACT, and to be honest I don’t understand why. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
Kevin T. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
This ruling is important because it may invalidate all Board decisions in the last year and also because the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Richard Cordray are subject to a similar lawsuit in State Nat. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Wonderful Katfriend Alberto Bellan, in his 36th weekly round-up of the previous week's IPKat blogposts, has shown that only three out of a total of 19 posts concerned the EPO, and 13 weren't really anything to do with patents at all. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Rosen for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
Trade mark matters involving Polo/Lauren seem to crop up in many jurisdictions, with varying results. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
Pi Day is coming up on Tuesday, and this case brought to mind the musical Pi case (Erickson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:17 am
Disrespect 1Barbato v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
In an early case, 1984’s Southland Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
The key question is now whether a ban of Intel-powered iPhones up to the iPhone X (but not the latest models) will actually be enforced. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:05 am
The background to the case As you may remember, at first instance, the District Judge held that Mrs Old’s sucessive payments of six months rent up front were in reality deposits – which as the landlord had failed to protect them, prevented him from being able to serve a valid section 21 notice. [read post]
