Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
  Thus, California's recent brief in Video Game Dealers Association v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
He's arrested in the parking lot, convicted of a weapons offense. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm by Elina Saxena
The Washington Post writes that “the Afghan military has always invested a large portion of its combat power into checkpoints and fixed positions, a strategy that has severely limited its ability to mount offensive operations. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm by Rick
(Which type of law, incidentally, California already had before Chelsea’s Law was recently passed.) [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a warrantless search of a California parolee, limiting the reach of that case to situations in which the supervisee chooses supervision in the community (and its attendant conditions) over imprisonment. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
After his initial take-down requests went unanswered by Google, he eventually served a section 10 DPA notice on Google asking for it to prevent the offensive material appearing in Google’s search results in the UK. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm by Michael Froomkin
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]