Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
And those aren't my words, they're Justice Rehnquist's in U.S. v Security Industries Bank. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
However, later in the stop, Appellant stated that he had just started a new job in Illinois before he left to go to California, but he was allowed to take a month off because business was slow. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 11:50 am
Therefore, in assessing the reprehensibility of employer McKesson's conduct, we must look to what McKesson's more senior managers knew and did.The case is Roby v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
California v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:44 pm
(United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
A reader points out that the above is incorrect because the residency laws are NOT RETROACTIVE per decision: Doe-v-Schwarzenegger 2-22-2007 (Hats off to our reader, proof that the media does a bad job on research) Four registered sex offenders, two of whom live in San Diego County, have challenged the residency restrictions, and their case is before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
Regardless of whether the acts between the two were voluntary, the act would have constituted statutory rape under California law. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In California, a score of 84 did the trick. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
I'm giving you his whole story so you'll get a clear and unadulterated sense of the guy: "The defendant, born in August 1983, committed his first offense in May 1998. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:18 am
App. 4th 1100 (1996), as could a pit bull, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:29 am
Last week I came across the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
As Justice Harlan wrote in Cohen v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:40 pm
Wednesday in Salazar v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm
From Arden v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
There are about a million California cases that say that theft is a lesser included offense of robbery. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
City of Boca Raton (1998) and the plaintiff fails to take advantage of the policy because of an unsupported subjective belief that it would be futile or lead to retaliation. [read post]
