Search for: "Tenant v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am by Amy Bray
On June 18 of this year, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled on the case of Bailey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:30 am by Friedland Law Group
After nearly a year and a half of litigation, parties to the case of Estate of Nelson v. [read post]
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coggan, 239 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1970) (ouster of co-tenant)6. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am by Samuel Bray
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
  This gave the court an opening. **** COMMENT 9 ***** Rent control in this state has been part of a crass, political calculation since 1943: there are more tenants who vote than landlords. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
  On December 29, 2003, the tenant agreed to settle the matter by paying $5,474.74.After that agreement was reached, Waterside discovered that the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) had increased the tenant’s rent and that the amount reserved in the parties’ stipulation did not accurately reflect the full legal rent due. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:37 am by DDowd
The notice shall inform the tenant of the tenant’s responsibility to maintain the smoke detection device in proper operating condition and of penalties for failure to comply with the provisions of RCW 48.48.140(3). [read post]