Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am by John Rubin
Similarly, the Florida Supreme Court held that the existence of probable cause does not warrant a denial of immunity; the court reasoned that its legislature intended the immunity provision to provide greater rights than already existed under Florida law. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by admin
But just because Plyler does not directly address access to college education does not mean Florida can restrict this access. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
 Missing the "safe harbor" deadline did not mean Florida was barred from sending electors to the Electoral College, only that its slate could be challenged at some point. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
 Liberals identify with the suspect in Fields, because they can imagine a decent person finding himself behind bars for a crime that he either did not commit or that does not merit incarceration. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am by Eugene Volokh
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:46 am by jonathanturley
Dobbs was based on the view that the Constitution does not contain a right to abortion, not that such a right is barred under the religious clauses. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm by Steve Bainbridge
From Bus Law Prof: The Florida Supreme Court recently issued the Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:00 pm
The function took place the day after the United States Supreme Court announced its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:36 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Importantly, Florida courts may not agree with the North Dakota Supreme Court’s analysis that vendors and other for-profit activity on the premises does not make an event a commercial activity. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2010) (evidence that computers were connected to the internet and were used to send emails was sufficient to show that they were `protected’). . . . [read post]