Search for: "The PEOPLE v. French"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
It seems unlikely to correspond to the online content people are most concerned about. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
”[5] HISTORICAL BACKGROUND An estimated 600,000 artworks were looted from Jewish people during the Nazi era.[6] The New York law defines the Nazi era as between 1933 and 1945, covering coercively exchanged property from the start of Hitler’s rise to power to the end of World War II. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Dado, La Grande Ferme--Homage à Bernard Réquichot (1962-3); CentrePompidou It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So, in answer to your second question, I think the history and culture of England and Wales does mean that we are unlikely to accept, for example, a general duty of good faith of the kind that is embodied in the French Civil Code. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
(NBCU) is a media and entertainment company created by the merger of General Electric's (GE) NBC and French Media Group's Vivendi Universal Entertainment (Vivendi). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
So method number one, is what most people are familiar with, is just regular symbolic AI. [read post]
1 Jun 2025, 7:26 am
She now reports on the upcoming consultations in more detail as follows: As mentioned, the Chair-Rapporteur of the OEIGWG for the Legally Binding Instrument (LBI), has confirmed the following second thematic consultation.Tuesday 3 and Wednesday 4 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: second consultation (arts. 6 and 8) Thursday 5 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: third consultation (arts. 9 and 11, if time permits, art. 10). . . [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Viral V. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
That broad public support could change somewhat (as I discuss later in this post), as the issue is reframed by advocacy groups, international NGOs, academic-activists, and journalists – particularly in the case of a Romney administration – away from being described as a way of using force more precisely, more sparingly of civilians and of US forces, and toward being described as secret kill lists and the president making unreviewable decisions about murdering people. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But people wish they could afford the protections of a lawyer’s solicitor-client relationship instead of having to depend upon merely LegalZoom’s buyer-seller relationship. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
I was delighted to have been asked to contribute to the International Scientific Conference ‘Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear’ taking place 9 November 2024, in Sofia Bulgaria (more on that event HERE). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Add that the Bill requires the platform to treat user content as illegal if it has no more than “reasonable grounds to infer” illegality, and we have baked-in over-removal at scale: a classic basis for incompatibility with fundamental freedom of speech rights; and the reason why in 2020 the French Constitutional Council held the Loi Avia unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this stratagem… [read post]
