Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2015, 4:55 am
Both parties moved for summary judgment and the District Court ruled in favor of the Appellee, answering the above-cited question in the negative.. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Twombly rewrote the law of civil litig. by having district judges pass on litigation by reading a complaint. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:49 pm
In sum, the Court held that because Mercer made no attempt to rebut the presumption of irreparable harm to InnoSys, the district court’s grant of summary judgment, Rule 11 sanctions, and attorney’s fees was improper. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:17 pm
The Rule has been challenged and defended in many federal district and appellate courts, and the four actions that were considered by the Sixth Circuit followed the decision of the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation to consolidate these appeals in the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
While CBE held the air “district’s selected baseline was impermissibly “hypothetical” because it was based on maximum permitted operating conditions that were “not the norm” “(CBE at 322), it also recognized there is no “uniform, inflexible rule” and agencies have discretion to devise a baseline that accommodates fluctuating operating conditions as long as it is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 7:53 pm
Authoritatively stated, however, the rule is that, while equal protection does not necessarily require territorial uniformity, "territorial distinction which has no rational basis will not support a state statute". [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:08 am
As we’ve detailed in past articles, a United States District Court for the District of North Dakota temporarily enjoined enforcement of the Rule on August 27. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Specifically, there is a question whether, under the terms of the CWA, challenges to the rule are to be brought in district or circuit courts. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am
Rule 23(b)(3) damages class: The court found predominance. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Among other reasons, the court said staying the Rule would remove uncertainty and confusion by restoring a uniform definition of “waters of the United States” nationwide. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
District Court for the District of Colorado ruled that the EEOC had satisfied all of its pre-suit conciliation requirements and demonstrated sufficient evidence to proceed to trial on behalf of a class of Muslim women who allege that Jetstream Ground Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Plaintiffs petitioned for creation of a Multi-district Litigation. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
This week would have marked the return of Tom Brady, had his four game suspension not been reversed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:46 pm
Denying JetStream’s motion for summary judgment, a federal district court in Colorado ruled that the employer failed to show the EEOC’s conciliation efforts on behalf of several Muslim workers, which included five exchanges of written conciliation proposals and an in-person conference, were insufficient under Mach Mining. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
Ashenden, 233 F.3d 473, 476-77 (7th Cir. 2000) (interpreting an identical provision of the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act under Illinois law). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Marina District Development Company, a New Jersey appellate court joins a long line of courts that simply refuse to see the illegal and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:09 pm
The resolution of that seeming conflict is procedural – “MPHJ has not appealed the district court’s ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:00 pm
Third, the district court erred in considering the merits of this common question. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
Presently fourteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Among other things, the Court held that the district court erred by requiring, as a prerequisite to certification, proof that the defendant maintained a "uniform policy requiring technicians to commute in the service vehicles. [read post]
