Search for: "US v. Green"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 6,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2021, 6:44 am
The case of Miles v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
In Kindred v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
Available judges (tagged with a green Available) are judges who have posted an open position. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 1:55 pm
By James V. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
He testified that he received his mail at Jefferson Avenue, and not at Greene Avenue. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Gucci v Guess trial kicks off in Manhattan For the past three years, luxury Italian fashion brand Gucci has been in a trade mark infringement dispute with mid-market fashion brand, Guess, over Guess's products which incorporate various Gucci trade marks and get-up such as Gucci's notable green and red strip design (US Trade Mark No.s 1, 483,526 and 1, 122, 789), the "square G" design (US Trade Mark Nos. 3,037,082, 2,214,272 and 2,042,805)… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
SB 226 (Simitian) SB 226 amends CEQA and other parts of the Public Resources Code to facilitate review of certain green projects. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:15 pm
Case Citation: Toth v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:35 am
State ,and State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Over the next decade, that interpretation of Brown became increasingly untenable as a legal matter, and was decisively rejected in Green v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:56 am
(See for example, Green v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
Myrick v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Realty Corp., 55 AD3d 454, 454 [1st Dept 2008], affd 13 NY3d 573 [2009], cert denied 561 US 1006 [2010]). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
November 29, 2016 - 2 PM: Unilever PLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
It is now the rule of democratic engagement, not the exception, ” said EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
US v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Their use was justified in 2020 in an entrapment hearing in R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:54 am
s right to rebut; and (2) variations in the wording of the Directions for the different Cavitron models created predominantly individual fact issues concerning reliance, so the court could not infer classwide reliance.See Slip Opinion, at 6.As reasoned by the Court, controlling Supreme Court authority deprived the trial court of discretion to reverse its prior ruling absent a material change in the law or the evidence:In Green v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Ivory issue (whether use of criminal history to increase sentence violated Apprendi)State v. [read post]
