Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 3:25 pm
Problem 17 --State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
Kagan complained that the United States had pointed to few sources with which to interpret the statute. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:01 pm
In Artis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
Totenberg alluded to a recent interview in which Ginsburg opined that the United States was not “experiencing the best of times. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:43 pm
The death penalty continues to keep the United States stuck in a 19th century wild west frontier mentality, with the nation standing as a barbaric execution example along with the constant execution machines of China, Iran and Saudi Arabia. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 2:37 pm
That case, Class v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
In 1971, in a case called Bivens v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
United States consular officials process millions of visa applications annually (see the State Department’s latest statistics here). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
Ct. 2128, 2139 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id. at 2142 (Breyer, J., dissenting); Kleindienst v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
Ct. 2128, 2139 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id. at 2142 (Breyer, J., dissenting); Kleindienst v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
” The President did not provide much detail regarding why, as the EO concluded, “these actions constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
