Search for: "United States v. Clarke"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
G. v the United Kingdom – 37334/08 [2011] ECHR 1308 (30 August 2011) ??? [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Clark and Dixon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Supreme Court (in Clark v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Clark, State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:28 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 266-267 [1976]; cf. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
NLRB v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
" The ruling also implied that the state's reticence left defendant Landrigan unable to meet his burden under the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Baze v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Ramirez’s article Adaption to Future Water Shortages in the United States is Caused by Population Growth and Climate Change is cited in the following article: Edward J. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:55 am
Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
STC, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
