Search for: "United States v. Jackson" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2022, 10:54 am by Otieno B. Ombok and Kristopher W. Peters
Both the O-1 nonimmigrant and EB-1 immigrant visa classifications remain important and flexible methods of sponsoring outstanding talent in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by David Oscar Markus
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am by Michael C. Dorf
Now insofar as that language precludes a "husband and husband" or a "wife and wife" from filing jointly, it's invalid under Obergefell and United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:23 am by Farrah Nagrampa
” You can find more information on the upcoming Supreme Court term at HeinOnline’s Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases or the SCOTUS Blog (includes case summaries). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause, and patent case Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-367); they are due Friday in Hardt v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
Some, most notably those who are either law nerds or untroubled by the substance, will raise the shock that a draft opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States was leaked to Politico. [read post]