Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
Article 11 of the EU Enforcement Directive also requires that Member States ensure that rightsholders are in a position to apply for an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe their trade-marks. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:28 am
By Mark V. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
Applicant argued that Opposer’s use of the HAWKWIND mark in the United States for musical recordings (1,000 albums sold per year) was de minimis and that Opposer had abandoned the mark for live musical performances, not having performed in the US for over 10 years. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:33 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:24 am
This marked the beginning of the end. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Patents The Kluwer Patent Blog focuses on the Unitary Patent system, considering that Brexit should not result in delays to German ratification of the Unitary Patent Court Agreement, as well as examining the progress of other Unitary Patent Court Member States in its pursuit of ratification.The IPWatchdog provides an overview of the drone delivery technology patent battle between Amazon and Walmart, who from June 2018 to June 2019 have filed 54 and 97 drone… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
" (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
Attorney Mark Lavine. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Having recently marked the forty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:33 am
Costco Faces False Patent Marking ClaimsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.In a qui tam complaint filed on behalf of the United States, a plaintiff stated false patent marking claims by alleging that Costco marked its premium Kirkland Signature brand diapers with two expired United States patent numbers, knowing that the patents had expired, with intent to deceive the public, the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In affidavit evidence accepted by the Board, the calendars associated with the Mark were manufactured in the United States by MWV Consumer & Office Products, a division of the Registrant. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Source: Apple Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 [read post]
