Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 9,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Trospium chloride, made by Madaus, was sold as "Céris" in France, as "uriVesc" in Germany and as “Regurin” in the United Kingdom -- where Madaus owned the United Kingdom trade mark REGURIN for pharmaceutical preparations etc in Class 5. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued its recent scrutiny of the practices of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in a non-precedential opinion issued November 22, 2023, regarding American Marriage Ministries’ challenge to the Universal Life Church’s “GET ORDAINED” trademark application based upon the alleged lack of distinctiveness and possibly failure to function as a mark for both classes of recited services. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon reversed the Board's decision dismissing an opposition to registration of the mark MANIMAL for a wide variety of clothing, including "children’s clothing. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
False Marking Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
False Marking Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Valeo and Citizens United. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 9:15 am
Levin WHEN: Wednesday, May 3 9:30 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit John Joseph Moakley U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:44 am
Monday, October 3 marks the start of the United States Supreme Court's October Term. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
