Search for: "Wal-mart Stores, Inc." Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 10:14 am by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolA recent case from the Eastern District of New York reflects that race discrimination class actions can be brought, and also reflects the type of claim which will likely still survive in the wake of last week's Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Wal-Mart, Inc.474 F.3d 1214(C.A. 9-Cal. 2007), op. withdrawn and superseded on den. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s landmark June 20, 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am by Kara Elgersma, Of Counsel
On May 20, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided whether an action instituted by the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia on behalf of the citizens of West Virginia against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corp., The Kroger Co., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreen Co. and Target Stores, Inc. was a class action, removable under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Jon Hyman
Dukes: What The Class-Action Decision Really Means for Employers – from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Why the Walmart Ruling is Good For Everyone – from Evil HR Lady Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:47 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Among other things, we will analyze the Supreme Court’s treatment of statistical evidence in the recent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
See: Aylward v Wal-Mart Stores Inc., CA No. 10-4799, 2011 WL 2357762 (D.N.J.) [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:26 pm by Law.com
Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in a massive gender discrimination class action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:19 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Yesterday (June 21), both sides filed supplemental briefs addressing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
In a staggering decision, the US Supreme Court ruled this week in the case of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. vs Dukes, et al., that a class action on behalf of approximately 1.5 million current and former female employees of Walmart could not move forward under the class certification rules set forth under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Bruce Nye
  Here are a few glimpses of what’s new: Class Actions:  Those who do not themselves live under rocks already know that the US Supremes poleaxed the employment discrimination case against Wal-Mart Stores in  Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by Christine Hurt
So, Monday the Supreme Court issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:49 am by Jenna Greene
In the Red: As lead counsel to the plaintiffs in the Wal-Mart Stores Inc employment discrimination lawsuit tossed out by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll dedicated about $5 million in attorney hours and spent $2 million on experts and discovery in the decade-long case, Reuters reports After Lipton: Among the elite Wall Street law firms, none is identified as closely with a single individual as Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by admin
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
Jackson, et al. (10-735), has been on hold until the case of Wal-Mart v. [read post]