Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 12,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:00 pm
As a result, the owner sued the insurer in a California state court for breach of contract and bad faith.Here is the question: Under the foregoing circumstances, did the insurer have sufficient minimum contacts with California to allow the state court to exercise personal jurisdiction over the company in this action? [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
The Truly Nolen court did not go so far as to say that Concepcion reversed the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
See Greenwood v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
(To be sure, it has prevailed in some other courts, including Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:07 am
Susan V. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
Ahluwalia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:50 am
Franco v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Freeman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
Overtime, minimum wage and appropriate record-keeping are all mandated under the Federal Labor Standards Act, as well as by California labor laws. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:15 am
The California Supreme Court has issued the most important wage and hour case of 2010, and it is not Brinker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Johnson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted How Racial Profiling in America Became the 'Law of the Land': United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
The court partially granted the executives’ motion to dismiss (what’s called a “demurrer” in California state courts). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Plus, it proves that the legal intelligencia views, and remembers, the relevant advertising as well as everyone else.Why, by the way, does California -- alongside a plethora of other states -- have these rules? [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:35 am
Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
