Search for: "Young v. State of California"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part V discusses the original approach to delinquency in the schools: “zero tolerance” policies. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Lélos Kai Sia EE (and Others) v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE: (IPKat), US: Bio commends Sen Specter for patent reform stance: (Patent Docs), US: USPTO rules on two of four neural stem cell patents in dispute between StemCells Inc and Neuralstem Inc; parties disagree on how extensively claims amended: (IP Law360), (IPBiz), US: Insmed continues fight for generic biologic approval: (GenericsWeb), Pharma & Biotech - Products Cipralex (Escitalopram) –… [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:06 am
In Mozes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The diagnosis is codified by several states, including the California legislature under its Health and Safety Code as “a medically serious, sometimes fatal, matter affecting newborns and very young children,” and is generally prosecuted as a form of child abuse. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In a statement, California Air Resources Board Chair Mary D. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm
In Hamen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
In the 9thCircuit, the IP exemption means federal IP; other circuits, and even California state law, include state based IP claims.Dogan: Need to argue on two levels: if yo [read post]
