Search for: ""fair use"" Results 1321 - 1340 of 10,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 12:18 pm by Anna Salvatore
The Supreme Court will determine whether Google’s use of Java Code was “fair use” under federal copyright law. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:07 am by Florian Mueller
It's also possible that Oracle wins affirmance on "fair use" (especially since a split 4-4 decision would be sufficient for affirmance), but I doubt it. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:53 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, Google has long held that APIs are not able to be protected by copyright and that, even if they are, the copying was fair use. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:37 pm by Corynne McSherry
A ruling for Google on fair use grounds would set a good precedent for the next developer of API-compatible software to argue that their use is also fair. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Factors two and three of the fair use test help define the boundaries of this type of fair use. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:03 pm by Ronald Mann
In the trial court, the parties did not submit detailed jury instructions on fair use, but rather agreed to a general question of whether the use was fair. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:54 am by Steve Baird®
Hearty thanks to Colette Durst, Stephen Lee, and Susan Perera, for generously sharing their insights and perspectives about trademark nominative fair use. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
What is the role of the Jury in deciding fair use? [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 5:29 pm by Chris Castle
As the leading fair use commentator Judge Pierre Leval teaches, that’s why fair use analysis is devoted to determining “whether, and how powerfully, a finding of fair use would serve or disserve the objectives of the copyright. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:29 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
Costco Wholesale Corp., USA, Costco raised triable issues of fact as to its liability for infringement and counterfeiting and whether its use of “Tiffany” to describe a ring style was fair use. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
RT: (based on this amicus) At its core, the fair use argument for Google is about why fair use is a multifactor test and why there are different kinds of fair uses. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
” In ruling that Minaj had established a fair use defense to Chapman’s copyright infringement... [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
” In ruling that Minaj had established a fair use defense to Chapman’s copyright infringement claims, Judge Phillips affirmed the important role of experimenting with copyrighted works prior to licensing as a common practice within the recording industry. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Kat Friends Gretchen Su and Lee in Hae shared their thoughts about a recent case from Singapore, where the use of personal names in trade marks was addressed. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
As I noted in this tweet stream, the entire Guilbeault interview raises troubling questions as he misstates the law on fair dealing/fair use, incorrectly describes how Facebook uses personal information and displays content, and inaccurately suggests that companies pay GST (consumers pay GST, companies collect and remit it). [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:15 am by Steven Tepp
Oracle, I’d like to build on the fair use discussion by Washington, D.C. attorney Terry Campo published in August to further analyze Google’s claims of fair use to excuse its copying. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:15 am by Steven Tepp
Now, Google wants the Supreme Court to hold that this is fair use under American copyright law. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Anyhow, the court gave “strong weight” to the “full disclosure” factor while also running through the Polaroid factors, as guided by the Second Circuit’s awful treatment of nominative fair use, sigh. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
’” Rather than explicitly arguing Dastar and First Amendment/nominative fair use, defendants argued that the NRA hadn’t alleged Lexmark standing or identified any false or misleading content on AMc’s website. [read post]