Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 11,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
On May 10, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter Strategic Technologies PTE, Ltd. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:23 am by Joel R. Brandes
”, born in the United States in 2004, from his habitual residence in France, and that such wrongful retention occurred on or about June 30, 2016. [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:55 pm by WIMS
On Petition for Review of Orders of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]