Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The problem of sexual harassment is still widespread despite decades in which there has been robust legal protection under both state and federal law. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:00 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
The Pew Center on the States has estimated that 1 in 100 Americans is in prison. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
We've covered the emergence of "say-on-pay" lawsuits pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act in light of the "business judgment rule"; this week, our friends at the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation also weigh in this week with a summary piece highlighting the lack of success "say-on-pay" plaintiffs have had in both state and federal court. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:24 pm
Accordingly, in 2010 the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Republicans’ refusal to pass budgets almost destroyed the California state government, at one point even preventing the state from issuing checks and requiring that temporary IOU vouchers be substituted to pay state employees and contractors. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Dispute Resolution; Governing Law (a) The exclusive venue for any action in respect of Section 13 of this Retention Plan shall be the state and Federal courts located in Harris County, Texas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Dispute Resolution; Governing Law (a) The exclusive venue for any action in respect of Section 13 of this Retention Plan shall be the state and Federal courts located in Harris County, Texas. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm
(“Dick”) Schmidt, was General Counsel for the United States Information Agency (USIA). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
