Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 1321 - 1340 of 3,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The bill would also prohibit employers from seeking or utilizing any information related to juvenile arrests, detentions, or court dispositions as a factor in their employment determination. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:26 am by Paul D. Knothe
 The Court noted that Attorney General opinions are not binding on the courts, and disagreed with the Attorney General’s analysis that the statute only confers peace officer status on custodial deputies while performing those duties. [read post]
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:04 am by SHG
The courts won’t allow you to file a civil rights claim against a police or government agency in general. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm by Jan von Hein
The Federal Court for Civil and Criminal Cases (Bundesgerichtshof = BGH) confirmed this decision and rejected the attorney general’s and the accused’s appeal against it. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm by Shea Denning
” That post describes the court of appeals’ determination in State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm by Shea Denning
” That post describes the court of appeals’ determination in State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 7:02 pm by Joy Waltemath
Generally, only a party named in an EEOC charge can subsequently be charged in a lawsuit filed in court under Title VII. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
The prosecutor's office withdrew from the case and the court appointed the attorney general to serve as a special prosecutor. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm by Daniel Cappetta
” Question 2: “‘In generally adopting the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 3.5 containing the language ‘prohibited by law,’ did the Supreme Judicial Court intend Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm by Daniel Cappetta
” Question 2: “‘In generally adopting the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 3.5 containing the language ‘prohibited by law,’ did the Supreme Judicial Court intend Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]