Search for: "BELL v. STATE" Results 1321 - 1340 of 3,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence'” (Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d at 877, quoting Kennedy v H. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Of course, for all those who are prone to mistakenly espouse the “innocent until proven guilty” presumption in arguing against any form of pre-conviction forfeiture, I feel compelled to remind my dear readers of Bell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Michigan Bell (10-313) and Isiogu v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:38 am by F. Tim Knight
.* Almost every day we hear reports describing another environmental disaster or extreme weather event reminding us that the climate change alarm bells are ringing loud and clear. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983).[6] Blue Shield v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]