Search for: "Battle v. United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 3,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, Part V addresses the future of workers’ compensation in the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by NCC Staff
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
One legal argument suggested that the United States need not make a formal declaration of war, because instead of joining a battle the country would be aiding victims of Nazi Germany’s international crimes – an argument dropped but later developed during the Nuremberg prosecutions. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Ayestas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
The State Department ended U.S. assistance to military units in Myanmar involved in the displacement of Rohingya Muslims, Foreign Policy reported. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]