Search for: "Black v. Little" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 4:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
The Board based this on the following findings: “Chiquita” means “little girl” or simply “little” in Spanish and was therefore descriptive. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It's All There in Black and White: The illustration at the outset of this post of course depicts the characters from the classic Spy v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm by Russell Knight
Start-ups and growing businesses have great potential but little current value. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
The problem was that the state had very little control over these marriages. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
So I’m going to start with a disclaimer: There are many aspects of our political culture in the U.S. in which I think we can justifiably take great pride.It’s a wonderful thing that one can criticize the president–even call him a socialist or a coddler of terrorists, if you like–and not worry about being arrested for it.It’s a great thing that one can pursue one’s own religious beliefs with a great deal of tolerance and that a black man can be president… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]