Search for: "Carter v. State" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
USPTO Director Kappos has stated that by including the PCT "more work can be shared between our two offices. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am by Giles Peaker
An example would be where the landlord gets the year wrong, as in Pease v Carter (where a notice of possession proceedings served on 7th November 2018 stated that court proceedings would not begin until after 26th November 2017, an obvious typographical error). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
As such, the ICC's provisions are highly protective of state jurisdiction by limiting the ability of the ICC to prosecute the same defendant in the wake of a credible domestic adjudication concerning the same conduct.Presumably, Articles 17 and 20 utilize different terminology (case v. conduct) to cover situations in which a crime base is under investigation, but a domestic indictment has not yet issued, so it is not known which specific domestic charges will be brought. [read post]
When denying a defendant’s request to remand a putative class action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA, a district court in New York educates the parties on the origins, purposes, and applicability of the local controversy exception and explains when the “no other action” element of the local controversy exception applies and why it exists.In Carter v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Claire Cartwright-Hignett & Alexander Carter-Silk (Speechly Bircham LLP). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  There is an item about the case on the Carter-Ruck website. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
Keynote address by Carter Phillips; articles by Susan Rose-Ackerman, Edward Rubin, Cynthia R. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
This changed after Carter v Canada in 2015, where the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously ruled that prohibiting physician-assisted death for individuals suffering from a grievous and irremediable medical condition was a violation of the section 7 of the Charter. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 The tortured case, Wilbur v Carter, arose from a paternity suit, not a divorce.The couple in this case conducted a protracted custody battle over their now 11-year old child. [read post]