Search for: "Case v. People" Results 1321 - 1340 of 51,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm by Nadia Kayyali
Another case challenging the telephone records program, Klayman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Betsy McKenzie
The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in the case of Authors Guild v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe justices will kick off the December argument session on Nov. 27 with oral argument in a pair of consolidated cases, Brown v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Part of the lawyer's job therefore is to facilitate communications with people outside. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
One Supreme Court case that will get more publicity than KSR v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
 In a case ironically involving a guy named Miranda.David Miranda wants a speedy trial. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 pm by Madelaine Lane
Pullen, Case No. 142751 and People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by becassidy
The media frenzy so tainted his case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a retrial in the decision Sheppard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:09 am by becassidy
The media frenzy so tainted his case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a retrial in the decision Sheppard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Hourani v Thomson & Ors ([2017] EWHC 432 (QB)) a businessman who was the target of a “sustained, highly sophisticated, cynical and calculated” campaign was awarded £80,000 in damages for defamation and harassment following a 10 day trial in the High Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
One case, Benisek v Lamone, challenges a Maryland congressional district, while the other, Rucho v Common Cause, challenges North Carolina’s congressional map. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
A nuisance action was upheld in Walker v Brewster (1867) 5 LR Eq 25 (Ch). where the defendant’s fetes attracted people who sat on a wall adjoining the plaintiff’s property, destroying their privacy. [read post]