Search for: "Corpus v. State" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
Rather, in Denedo, CAAF premised its assertion of jurisdiction on the All Writs Act.CAAF, in a 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It divided 5-2 on the interpretation of the five-year limit and on the provision that allows superior court decisions in habeas corpus cases to be appealed to the intermediate courts of appeal rather than the state supreme court.The case is Briggs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:05 am by R.J. MacReady
Click here for a link to a summary of this lengthy opinion.PD-1123-08 & PD-1124-08, Jeffery Daniel Hughen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Schlosser PDF Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
In the 1864 trial of Packard v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: Below is today's habeas Appellate Court opinion: AC32044 - Thompson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by Mike
Hedgepeth is a pro se prisoner petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 6:12 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is pointed out in a 2002, Corpus Christi Court of Appeals opinion styled, Northern County Mutual Insurnace Company v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Obama 13-638Issue: (1) Whether the court of appeals failed to apply the governing preponderance of the evidence standard in affirming the denial of petitioner's habeas corpus petition, thus denying him the meaningful review mandated by Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by Scott Harman
It states: Application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Mitts (Relisted after the 4/15 and 4/22 Conferences) Docket: 10-1000 Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]