Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
The court cited with approval Dukes v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:38 pm
Women in all other states have until May 25, 2012 to file their EEOC claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:10 am
In Ross v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Dukes. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In Ross v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
V. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
The most recent casualty of the holding in Dukes is Cortez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:05 am
Dukes, right? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
Expanding and intensified level of DOL enforcement, as well as likely impact of the upcoming Supreme Court decision in Christopher, et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:20 pm
In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:07 am
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit hears oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
As the Second Circuit observed in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 pm
" United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
John Hope Franklin, whose legacy Arcidiacono treads upon, provided research for Thurgood Marshall in the Brown v. [read post]
