Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2015, 10:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
Justice Kane referred back to a prior 3rd Department decision, Valentine v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Eric Neisser, Charging for Free Speech: User Fees and Insurance in the Market For Free Ideas, 74 GEO. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
” To provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs and to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State; For departments and agencies with responsibilities relating to healthcare or health insurance to encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare… [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
On May 23, 2012, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Bershadskaya v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
  It even makes hemp an eligible crop under the federal crop insurance program. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
  It even makes hemp an eligible crop under the federal crop insurance program. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
  It even makes hemp an eligible crop under the federal crop insurance program. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
It remains possible, however, that even if the Court does accept one or more cases for review, and decides them by the end of next June, that the result would not necessarily settle the constitutionality of the insurance mandate. [read post]