Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Because after all, there has to be a limit on how much we allow monetary calculations to trump our own humanity. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:25 pm
OSHA, regulated by the federal Department of Labor, takes the view that restroom use is not a privilege but a basic right and health necessity. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
WellPoint, Inc.o Federal Law Does Not Permit Racial Discrimination Based Upon Client's PreferencesPleener v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Taking up defendant’s argument, the Court of Appeals first explained that G.S. 20-139.1(b)(1) makes breath tests admissible if they are “performed in accordance with the rules of the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
In the enforcement arena, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and state attorneys general pursued enforcement action during 2014 against companies that had suffered data breaches. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
But does it have any teeth, really? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
So writes The Onion in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Novak v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am
Defendant came to trial on the charges in January of 2023, after an investigation by the Cleveland County Department of Social Services into allegations that defendant sexually abused his two daughters. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
Like how does it affect me? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am
K-V’s announcement of the termination in an 8-K triggered an investigation by the local U.S. attorney, and regulatory actions by the FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
The Department of Health and Human Services—which initially oversaw the federal government’s response to the virus—suggested that it was distributing personal protective equipment (PPE) on the basis of population. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
Petition for certiorari Last July, the federal Agency for International Development, the Health and Human Services Department, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention asked the Court to review the case and uphold the message mandate. [read post]
