Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
The motion to dismiss made by Georgia State raised the issue that federal courts (which are courts of limited jurisdiction; they can hear only certain types of cases) usually are not allowed to hear cases against state governmental entities. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
It is these governmental entities and officials that should do this, and should do that. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[v]Another element that may cause some misunderstanding of the priorities in a layoff -- the individual may have been appointed to what has been designated a “permanent position” or appointed to position designated a “temporary position. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
” See also, State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Supreme Court decision in 1982’s Plyler V. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
(internal cites deleted) DiQuisto v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Courts have typically found that limitations placed on a public officer or employee with respect to his or her disclosing matters of public interest violates the individual’s right of free speech.In contrast, prohibiting an individual from publicly discussing subjects or governmental decisions or actions involving matters of a personal interest rather than a public interest does not violate the individual’s constitutionally protected right of free speech. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
However, the mere filing of a complaint or counterclaim alleging a claim against a governmental entity does not give the district court subject matter jurisdiction over that claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:19 pm
Network v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
O'Brien v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
n v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
Because the district courts can only adjudicate claims against governmental entities under the narrow confines of the WGCA, subject matter jurisdiction cannot be invoked upon the mere filing of a complaint alleging a claim against a governmental entity. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
McConnell , supra , at 144 (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:11 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:40 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:09 pm
In Henisse v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
Yet this does not mean that all expertise is freely transferable. [read post]
