Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 8,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2021, 4:28 am
There’s a case called Brady v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The law codified the ‘ABC Test’[1] which had been applied by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles ((2018) 4 Cal.5th 903). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Monell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
The per se damages rule does not apply to the latter. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:32 am
The Court of Federal Claims decision in Tolliver Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:35 am
In Hogan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:31 am
A recent Canadian Federal Court decision (Teva v Pharmascience, 2020 FC 1158) adds yet further nuance to the critical question of when a second-medical use patent application should be filed. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:47 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released an appeal in A.P. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:59 am
The court, in Gentes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
The fact that Section 11A authorized the SEC to require the SROs to act jointly with respect to the national market system does not exclude the involvement of non-SROs, and the court should not accept so narrow a reading, the brief contends.The case is No. 20-1181. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:58 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice put forward several motions in a wrongful dismissal case, Kaminsky v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Citing Schnabel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:59 am
In Briggs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Superior Court (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 837, and my 8/5/20 and 8/26/20 posts on it can be found here and here. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice differentiated these different approaches to intermediary liability in Baglow v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
In cases like Pickering v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am
Even if the court is technically correct that Borello was not a Wage Order case, the court’s decision unfortunately does not reflect reality. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903 (Dynamex) applies retroactively. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In Davis-Lynch Holding Co., Inc. v. [read post]