Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 40,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:11 pm
In Barbour v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Payton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
If you happen to be down the road enjoying a late breakfast at Rama Jama's or an early lunch at Dreamland, y'all come. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
As previously reported on this blog the Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case of North & Ors v Dumfries and Galloway Council (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 45. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:28 pm
The State appealed Judge Jacobson’s decision in Garden State Equality v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:09 am
The measure, nicknamed “Docs v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:31 am
Related Issues: Free SpeechSection 230 of the Communications Decency ActRelated Cases: Internet Archive v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
In the Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:43 pm
Costco v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Both before and after Zelman, state courts have struck down private-school voucher programs under such provisions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
The Court rules in favor of the pregnancy center.The case is National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 12:21 am
I read over the amicus brief filed by the Virginia Attorney General and others in the case of King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:15 am
Judge Brown set the tone for her decision by quoting the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Loper Bright Enters. v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:11 am
Supreme Court’s April 19 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 pm
So, I suppose Justice Sotomayor, contrary to her Senate testimony, is okay with the use of international precedent to strike down laws passed by 37 states. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
(Gentry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:47 am
In a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
