Search for: "E. C. D." Results 1321 - 1340 of 20,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
Dans le cas de l’UE, le RGPD crée chez certains un appétit bien compréhensible pour une seconde occasion de la création d’une norme transnationale, c’est-à-dire un système potentiellement extraterritorial, même viral. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Innus de Uashat et de Mani-Utenam (Innus de UMM) c. [read post]
The Illinois Supreme Court agreed with the appellate court that sections 15(c) and 15(d) plausibly involve publication, and could fall within the one-year limitations period. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As to subsections (c) and (d), the Court agreed  that a one-year statute of limitations could be applied to those subsections, but ultimately ruled otherwise. [read post]
In Tims, the First District Appellate Court previously held that a one-year statute of limitations applies to claims under sections 15(c) and 15(d) of BIPA, but that the five-year statute of limitations applies to claims under sections 15(a), 15(b) and 15(e). [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 11:04 am by José Guillermo
Pensé de inmediato en la Próstata inflamada, pero lo he descartado NO TENGO LA SENSACIÓN DE QUE HAY ALGO por esa delicada parte de nuestro cuerpo, no me sucede tal cosa, la orina no ha cambiado, la frecuencia es normal, pero la cantidad se ha reducido, NO experimento ardor al hacerlo.Por otro lado ignoro que relación podría existir entre ese órgano del hombre y no ingerir alimentos.Le escribí a la señora Cazorla el correo que más… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
Section 15(c) pertains to selling or otherwise profiting from collected biometric information. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Reg 28(2)(e) had to be read in the context of (a) to (d), such that the crisis must be of a severity that would otherwise justify overriding the free will of the person in detaining them or removing them. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 3:56 am by Dan Filler
Please visit Required Employment Notices and Posters to view our non-discrimination statement and find additional information about required background checks, sexual harassment/misconduct disclosures, COVID-19 vaccination requirement, and employment eligibility review through E-Verify. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
Admittedly, I am playing the role of the curmudgeon here by pointing out errors or confusions in the third edition of the Reference Manual. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:01 am by The Yellow Sheet
e-EQE website and useful resources: Check out the information on this page In particular, read the Instructions to Candidates and the FAQ The myEQE page has your individual documents (e.g. registration details) General outline of 2023 EQE: Pre-exam: 17 March2 parts legal questions (70 min for each part) with 20 min break between the partsBreak (80 min)2 parts claim analysis (70 min for each part) with 20 min break between the parts Paper D: 7 March – split… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:31 am
This discussion concludes with a set of policy recommendations, such as: (a) requiring disclosure of advisory firms’ other businesses, (b) increasing the transparency of the business model of proxy advisory firms, particularly around the rationale for their general guidelines for voting recommendations, (c) ensuring that the regulatory burden on proxy advisory firms does not discourage entry, and (d) increasing the regulatory oversight of the voting process with a view to… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:31 am
This discussion concludes with a set of policy recommendations, such as: (a) requiring disclosure of advisory firms’ other businesses, (b) increasing the transparency of the business model of proxy advisory firms, particularly around the rationale for their general guidelines for voting recommendations, (c) ensuring that the regulatory burden on proxy advisory firms does not discourage entry, and (d) increasing the regulatory oversight of the voting process with a view to… [read post]