Search for: "FIRST MERIT"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 32,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2007, 11:07 am
Milardo argues in his brief only that, although “the mere filing of a FOIA request is not necessarily ipso facto the exercise of a protected First Amendment right, the nature of the request in this case does merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
This morning, the Court issued five opinions in cases argued on the merits. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:37 am
The same is true for cases brought under the First Amendment and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
” (“First, [the States] contend that the individual mandate is unconstitutional . . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:13 pm
If none has merit, the UCC will recover many millions of dollars for the estate. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm
We believe the merits of our complaint are strong and substantial. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
., 2013 NY Slip Op 00276, Appellate Division, First Department In deciding this appeal, the Appellate Division, in a three to two decision, said that Civil Service Law §115 codifies a critical public policy, which is that, "to attract unusual merit and ability to the service of the state of New York, to stimulate higher efficiency among the personnel, to provide skilled leadership in administrative departments, to reward merit and to insure to the people and… [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 11:39 am
When "feel good" handbook policies like this are not followed by management, a culture of cynicism and hypocrisy emerges in most companies.This is probably even more true in the case where the person who created the policy and widely publicized its merits, violates its own terms just a few weeks later just as publicly.Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:52 pm
First, the exhibit annexed to defendant's motion, is the complaint report from witness’ arrest. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:24 am
April 21 is now the first date on which, barring something unusual, perhaps we will find out. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:03 am
The post "Retroactive Anonymity Is an Oxymoron" + "It Is Never Appropriate to Seal Entire Appeals" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:39 pm
First is this one, on page 59: "Whether the President has such authority [to detain petitioners indefinitely] turns on whether the AUMF authorizesâ€â [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 10:57 am
We’re reviving a concept originated by our former Editorial Director Kate Brannen, who asked: What stories or topics merited more attention in the past year, with a particular eye toward what might inform law and policy conversations in the year ahead? [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm
The federal First Circuit Court of of Appeals addresses this in Vargas-Colon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
In a non-explanatory order issued on October 20, the United States Supreme Court decreed that the names of those who signed petitions to put a Washington State referendum on the ballot to repeal the state's recently-enacted law expanding benefits for registered domestic partners must be kept secret until a final ruling on the merits of the claim that revealing the names would violate the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:39 am
A spokesman for Facebook said, “We are reviewing the decision and continue to believe that the case is without merit. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:14 am
The first suit filed with regard to this issue was brought forth in 2001 by six women. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
At first glance, they may seem reasonable, as defendant is a sex-offender. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:08 am
FCC and net neutrality proponents win the first skirmish, but there are bigger battles ahead. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm
The first case, JSJ Limited, involved the type of "res judicata" that -- to avoid precisely this type of linguistic confusion in the first place -- we call "claim preclusion" (or, if you prefer the old terms, "true" res judicata). [read post]
