Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
Since the opinions were released yesterday morning, the blawgosphere has cranked out a ton of posts about what the Jones v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
As you recall, earlier this year Florida passed SB 7072, a brazenly censorial #MAGA bill. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
California Teachers Association 14-915Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief by the American Federation of Teachers and American Association of University Professors in support of the respondents in this case.Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
In light of the Court’s decision in Black v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
In Clark v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
The first is Cyan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:04 am
First up is Perry v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am
The justices once again did not act on Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s opinion in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Kansas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
Ariane de Vogue reports at CNN that Monday’s decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
