Search for: "HOWARD v. STATE" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in Jones v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm by Betsy McKenzie
(Chronicle of Higher Education, “Two Universities Under the Legal Gun”by Marc Parry and Jennifer Howard, May 29, 2011 and Chronicle of Higher Education “What’s at Stake in the Georgia State Copyright Case” May 30, 2011 Experts”Kevin L. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am by Harold O'Grady
Professor Napolitano discusses his role in the upcoming Evening with United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia scheduled for Friday, March 21, 2014 from 5:30 pm to 7:00 pm at the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s Howard Gilman Opera House. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The claimant was assisted in bringing his case by the Howard League for Penal Reform. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:43 pm by Steve Lubet
Here is the description: Despite the aftershocks of Politico obtaining and publishing a draft majority opinion that would overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg] Time for state legislators to consider enacting stronger protections against unfounded suits? [read post]