Search for: "Hart v. Hart" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus the "pleading is sufficient to establish that the parties mutually contemplated that [Levinson's] work and representation for [the transaction] would continue after [the closing date] and, therefore, the continuous representation doctrine applies," and the statute of limitations was tolled (Symbol Tech., Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 69 AD3d 191, 195; see Carnevali v Herman, 293 AD2d 698, 699; Khan v Hart, 270 AD2d 231). [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 3:09 am by John Hochfelder
In charging the error in judgment rule, Judge Hart ignored clear and binding precedent from New York’s highest court in the case of Nestorowich v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:42 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Boise attorney Chuck Peterson on Peterson Law Offices' Idaho Criminal Defense Blog David v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:01 am by Eric
Rader Fishman was one of 1-800 Contacts' "go to" law firms until a key partner switched to a different law firm (Holland & Hart), and 1-800 Contacts made the switch with him. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:30 am by Meg Martin
Combs of Holland & Hart LLP, Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Design Committee of the Homestead Div.: James K. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:37 am by Justin E. Gray
Apr. 8, 2010) Last week in a one-page order, Judge Hart in the Northern District of Illinois granted defendants' motion to stay a false marking litigation pending resolution of the Stauffer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assuming, however, that Fatato acted as Striano's agent and was aware of the borrower's counsel's advice (such that Fatato's knowledge can be imputed to Striano), the defendant "may not shift to the client the legal responsibility [he] was specifically hired to undertake because of [his] superior knowledge" (Hart v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 211 AD2d 617, 619). [read post]