Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
As a result of the elasticity of this standard, despite being on the books for a decade and a half, the issue has arisen in only one case here in Ohio, Ohio State Bar Assn. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:24 am
Commissioner, which addresses the rules for deductions of unreimbursed out of pocket expenses incurred in charity work. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am
FTC and Broadcom v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Matter of Gronowicz v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:15 am
”Tier III hearings address the most serious inmate misbehavior implicating the most severe punishment and "may be conducted by the superintendent of the correctional facility, the deputy superintendent, a captain, a commissioner's hearing officer employed by DOCS's central office," or "some other employee" designated by the correctional facility's superintendent "in his or her discretion. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:08 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:29 pm
” The court accepted the findings of the ALJ and Commissioner that O’Brien’s real motivating for making the statements was her dissatisfaction with her job and the conduct of some of her students, not a desire to comment on “matters of public concern. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:30 am
A dissenting commissioner (cited by the court) made good points regarding how plaintiffs have capitalized on texts to recycled numbers. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:01 pm
” A group of Black civil rights leaders including Martin Luther King, Jr., was organized to discuss Colvin’s arrest with the police commissioner. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:16 am
App. 569; 305 N.W.2d 541 (1981) (attorney Kelly represented an intervening plaintiff in an Open Meetings Act dispute) and Hernden v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 4:35 pm
Commissioner. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
: Don't rely on Timbs v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:56 am
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 June 2015. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the legislation. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In Grutter v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:19 pm
Meanwhile, in Scheidelman v. [read post]
