Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 1321 - 1331 of 1,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
  No - under the Subdivision Map Act - according to California courts in the case of Black Hills Investments v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
  The Supreme Court jump started this issue in January through its work in Hill v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:39 pm
Responding in part to the Supreme Court's contribution to this mess with its ruling in Hill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
She then said that she assumes Westerman relies heavily on the Court's opinion in Hill, and that he focuses on the first element of Hill, and argues that the complainants have no privacy right because they voluntarily gave their identifying information to Pioneer, so that would be the end of the analysis. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:13 pm
* 3 pm update to the updates from Ted: "An Illinois intermediate appellate court overturned the $27 million verdict in Mikolajczyk v. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
In the end, this debate was resolved not by the power of either side's arguments, but by Capitol Hill politics. [read post]