Search for: "His Law v. USA"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 6:38 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Warhol, Prince and a Supreme Court debate over ‘fair use’; The justices are evaluating whether Andy Warhol violated copyright law by basing his art on an image of Prince used without the photographer’s permission. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
” – Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, in a dissent in Callins v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
" Sentencing Law and Policy offers a recap of another of yesterday's arguments, Johnson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
The previous day Sir Joseph Pilling, the so-called “External Reviewer” of IPSO released his report. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the court summarily reversed in CNH Industrial v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
At the moment, there is no basis on which transfers of data to the USA can be any more justified than they were when the CJEU ruled in Schrems. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Racky, deceased v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:48 am
Go back to this post from August about United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
Moreover, passage in 2015 of the USA FREEDOM Act, which includes a provision that requires that the government conduct a review for potential public release of FISA opinions that include a significant interpretation of law, constitutes a new and distinct statutory regime for release of certain FISA court opinions. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
The National Law Journal’s Tresa Baldas has a story on Kasten v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:51 am
These misgivings, as Ariba India v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:32 pm
In Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Call for papers and panels: 7th ICLARS Conference The 7th ICLARS Conference will be held at the University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA, from 21 to 23 October 2024, organised jointly by the Religious Liberty Initiative of the University of Notre Dame Law School and the International Centre for the Study of Law and Religion at Brigham Young University Law School. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Take, for example, O'Brien v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
In Jaimez v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Read David Rolph’s commentary on the piece, including his analysis of injurious falsehood, here. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
” In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Circuit’s decision in Qassim v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
