Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
The success (or lack thereof) of the filed applications is reviewed.The patent drawing requirements, and their fitness for purpose were discussed in another post by GuestKat Rose Hughes. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
  Nicholas also set out the position in respect of injunctive relief following the Huawei v ZTE framework. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of its mark… [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am by Walter Olson
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:58 am
I don't propose to go through the law on this point, but yesterday I read the case of Berkeley v Bulliqi [2007] EWCA Civ 1101 (thanks again to Family Law Week), hoping for some enlightenment. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 11:11 am by Alfred Brophy
 Another piece of this expansive and exciting project appeared in the North Carolina Law Review last spring, "Hughes v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:17 am
  The videos are: Marci Hamilton on free exercise Michael Eric Herz on designing environmental regulations Melanie Leslie on the crime of child endangerment Stewart Sterk on Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:13 pm
He has worked closely with most of CBC’s national and regional programs, on radio, television and in digital media.He is known for his advocacy for cameras in court, and was involved in many cases of significance in media law, including Dagenais v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:47 am
” He said Dawe should have known about an Ontario Court of Appeal case, Piedra v. [read post]