Search for: "In re D. W." Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2009, 1:49 pm
Footnote: *Internal Revenue Code of 1939 §22(b)(5) cite in Taxation of Damages Awards and Settlement  Payments   Author: Robert W. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
Zu prüfen ist also, ob der Fachmann unter Heranziehung des allgemeinen Fachwissens den beanspruchten Gegenstand als - explizit oder implizit - unmittelbar und eindeutig in der ursprünglichen Fassung der Anmeldung offenbart ansehen würde (Punkt 4.5.4 der Entscheidungsgründe). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
" The Board noted that "[w]hile the Board’s dismissal of the prior opposition would not be sufficient for issue preclusion purposes, it is a final judgment on the merits for purposes of claim preclusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But when you’re writing high impact scholarship, even if you’re going to be taking your article and spinning it to editorials [or amicus briefs!] [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Interference w/ normal exploitation? [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault
One of the enabling factors for the abuses committed in the early years of the George W. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
If there is a number in this line, you need to ask for your spouse’s W-2 form which was provided to them by their employer. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
We're slamming someone on the open forum that is the internet. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:55 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
» Ein solcher bürokratischer Wahnsinn wäre selbstverständlich möglich. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:51 am
If it’s folks you agree with, then you’re happy because your preferred policies are being implemented. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   (I guess we’re about to conduct a natural experiment on this w/software in the EU.)We’ve already moved to a licensing based system of digital distribution. [read post]