Search for: "JACKSON v. STATE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 6,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:56 pm
And the Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
M.B.Z. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date, on the following issue: WHETHER PRECEDENT AUTHORIZING COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TO ORDER SENTENCE-ONLY REHEARINGS SHOULD BE OVERRULED BASED ON: (A) JACKSON v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
Jackson, 67 So.3d 1203 (Florida Court of Appeals – Second District 2011); see also T.B. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
The Story of Wetzel v Lambert The case of Wetzel v Lambert was decided by the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:41 pm
Youngstown (Jackson, J., concurring). [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Jackson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:07 pm
blog in which he discusses at length and in at least three parts, his handling of the case of State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 8:22 am
" Aguilar v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 6:32 pm
Michelle Rye v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the… [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:41 am
Louderback and Hannifan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization, (Sup. [read post]
