Search for: "JJS"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
., and KENNEDY, GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined, and in which ALITO, J., joined except for Part III–B. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
Singhvi JJ.) struck down the impugned sub-section (2A) as violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm
Scherer at (JJS@kjk.com; 216.736.7296). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:51 am
However, the majority (Moldaver, Gascon and Rowe JJ.) parted company with Martin J. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:58 am
Butterworth, S195505—Review Denied [Kennard, Baxter, and Corrigan, JJ., voting for review]—October 26, 2011 This was an action by a tenant against landlords for malicious prosecution, tenant harassment and wrongful eviction. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Since the Two Judge Bench (consisting of AK Ganguly and Gyan Sudha Mishra, JJ.) differed on whether the claims in the case could be referred to arbitration under the 1983 Law, the Bench referred the matter to the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger Bench to decide the question. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:40 am
To learn more about how you can benefit from these developments, contact KJK’s Economic Development & Incentives attorneys Rich Morehouse (RAM@kjk.com; 216.736.7292) or Jim Scherer (JJS@kjk.com; 216.736.7296). [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:52 am
Brumley, 116 F.3d 728, 736 (5th Cir. 1997) (Jolly & DeMoss, JJ., dissenting) (§ 1346 is “general, undefined, vague, and ambiguous”). ... [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:49 am
The Lord Chief Justice, Royce and Macur JJ wearily noted that: We shall not anxiously parade an inclusive list of all the relevant statutory provisions. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
And Emond is giving Hearsay readers 15% off the book until June 30.In the newest edition of Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, Justice Jill Witkin and defence lawyer Daniel Brown give a comprehensive overview of sexual offence litigation, from arrest to appeal.The 3rd edition includes:A new chapter on appeals, covering landmark cases like R v JJ, 2022 SCC 28Legislative changes from Bill S-12Expanded coverage of myths and stereotypesAnd guidance on… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:46 pm
Secondly, Sundberg J joined the gang (so far comprising Finkelstein and Gyles JJ) rejecting any standard other than the Registrar being satisfied on the balance of probabilities. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ, and Aston and Willes… [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 8:09 pm
For dissing the feds.Sigh.Yvonne Wingett, JJ Hensley and Michael Kiefer lay out charges and counter-charges in the Arizona Republic. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
McGuinness and Fennelly JJ. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European Community legislation. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:25 am
However, a 2008 study co-authored by JJ Prescott of the University of Michigan Law School yielded largely positive results. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:34 am
After considering the application of s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution to statutory intellectual property rights generally, Crennan and Kiefel JJ reached the same conclusion at [129], pointing out at [130] that the record companies could not accept s 220 of the Copyright Act as valid and at the same time contend that ss 109 and 152 were invalid. [129] When ss 8, 31, 85, 89(1), 207 and 220(1) of the 1968 Act are read together, it is clear that the copyright of the relevant plaintiffs under… [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:44 pm
See Dobbs (BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., dissenting) (explaining that the Framers "defined rights in general terms to permit future evolution in their scope and meaning"); New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
