Search for: "JUSTICE DEPT."
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
James Sensenbrenner, stated that Dept. of Justice’s interpretation of Sec. 215 was contrary to Congressional intent (though there is a dispute regarding whether Sensenbrenner was aware of DOJ’s interpretation prior to the Snowden disclosures). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:45 am
Opportunity:Offshore Refugee and Humanitarian Visas: Creating a Simpler Framework (Australian Dept. of Immigration & Border Protection, Jan. 2015) [access]- Comments sought on a/m discussion paper; submit them by 16 February 2015.Resources:Abbott’s Gambit: The 2013 Australian Federal Election (ANU Press, 2015) [text]- See esp. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
Matter of Smith v Russo, 230 AD2d 863 [2d Dept 1996]; Matter of Chu v Sino Chemists, 192 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 1993]), and the nature and extent of any intervening changes to the business and/or its value certainly could be considered. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
Why does today's opinion by the California Supreme Court, which overrules the Court's eight-year old Equal Protection decision in Hofsheier, remind me of the old Gilda Radner skit. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:39 am
In Only a Fool Has an Attorney for a Client Justice Beds shares his third law:Bedsworth's Third Law of Practice Dynamics: Represent robbers or murderers, bulls or bears, congressmen or kitten-drowners, but do not, under any circumstances, represent attorneys.And on the topic of articles by Justices, Presiding Justice Luis Gonzalez (NYAD 1st Dept.) has Celebrating the Legacy of the Magna Carta -- in today's New York Law Journal. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:42 am
We can help you fight for justice and pursue the maximum possible in compensation. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
White, 100 AD3d 1397, 953 NYS2d 423 (4th Dept 2012) (two seconds) . [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:41 pm
Government Intervenes in Lawsuit Against Florida Cardiologist Alleging Unnecessary Peripheral Artery Interventions and Payment of Kickbacks, Department of Justice, January 5, 2015 Justice Department Joins Suits Against Florida Cardiologist, Wall Street Journal, January 5, 2015 Justice Dept. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
The above ruling, found in Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
And though Justice Kennedy participated in those two cases, he didn’t write them, and was just one of the majority Justices. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
. # 13 Dept. of Justice Wait, we already covered this under Eric Holder. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Vermont Dept. of Taxes, 2014 VT 81By Jeffrey M. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
Baby Girl Borough of Jim Thorpe Carcieri challengers Cobell settlement beneficiaries Cohen Handbook Dept. of Justice Gray wolves Indian country pot growers National Native American Bar Assn. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Pokoik v Pokoik, 115 AD3d 428, 2014 NY Slip Op 01502 [1st Dept Mar. 6, 2014], a first impression ruling in which the Appellate Division, First Department, in granting summary judgment against an LLC manager for breach of fiduciary duty, rejected the manager’s reliance on the safe-harbor provisions of LLC Law § 409. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:12 pm
Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (Native American Housing Assistance and Self–Determination Act)Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. [read post]
